Home
What's New
Wylfa
Demi Moore
Beaches
Attractions
Newsletter
Airport
Historic Coast
Lighthouses
Rail Travel
Air Travel
Sitemap
Contact Us
Travel Centre
Energy
World Travel
Map
Healthy Living
Dublin Ferry
My Discovery
Eating Out
Accommodation
News Archive
Community
Property
Local Business
 

Comments for
New Nuclear Costs Compared to Alternatives

Average Rating starstarstarstarstar

Click here to add your own comments

Mar 22, 2008
Rating
starstarstarstar
Go nuclear, the cheapest option
by: Jamie Leah

Yes, it is true that while nuclear power stations have a high initial capital cost, once ready they are much cheaper to run than wind turbines, which receive big subsidies from the taxpayer.

Also wind farms do nothing on cold, frosty, still nights and warm, sunny days with not a breath of wind.

Hurry up with the new build, I don't want to live through power cuts and blackouts, or shiver in the dark, eating a cold turkey sandwich!

Feb 25, 2008
Rating
starstarstarstarstar
Nuclear is cheapest energy
by: Anonymous

I just wish these figures could be made available to the wider public, because this just shows how nuclear is more competitive than wind.

Also remember those days when have no wind, and those turbines stand still. Where is the power coming from then?

And nuclear is cheaper even than coal and it doesn't produce all that carbon dioxide and other pollution.

So what are they waiting for? Let's get started with a new power station, have cleaner electricity and make more jobs.

Click here to add your own comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How?
Simply click here to return to Wylfa B Yes or No?

Return to New Nuclear Costs Compared to Alternatives



footer for Anglesey page